Catchphrases speak volumes sometimes. They can be very useful in presenting complex issues in a simple and familiar manner, in a way easy to remember.
In the last year we spoke quite a lot about the European Union being the largest contributor of development assistance, an influential economic actor which is aiming at strengthening its political presence on the global scene. This latter objective is one of the reasons behind the institutional changes, contained in the Lisbon Treaty.
However, some doubts and the eternally famous question about the EU's telephone number keep coming back. Recently, I have heard in Brussels two catchphrases which might be of help when describing the objectives of the EU when launching the European External Action Service project:
The EU's goal is to go forward from being a PAYER to becoming a PLAYER.
We do not really aim at establishing a single telephone number for the whole EU. What we do want is a SINGLE MESSAGE, to be conveyed by all 27 (more precisely 28) telephone numbers.
torsdag 24. februar 2011
onsdag 22. desember 2010
Looking back at 2010
The year of 2010 is about to end. Has it made a difference in the relationship between Norway and the European Union? Has it brought to the surface new players and factors which will have a lasting impact?
Firstly, the health of the euro (and that of the whole EU economy) has been under close scrutiny throughout the year. Although recovery is visible and the basic underlying processes are positive, the crisis is not over and several member states had to introduce radical austerity programmes. Due mainly to the crisis and according to public opinion polls, at present only one in four Norwegians would support EU membership. But we all hope that the crisis will be overcome.
On the other side of the same coin, events have revealed in a striking manner the far-reaching consequences of the fact that our economies (of Norway and the EU) are so closely integrated. It has dawned upon us that continued difficulties would affect all sides and there is a clear common interest in rising above them. I hope the understanding of this will be more durable that the crisis itself.
Secondly, this year has seen Norway launching a reflection on the experiences with the EEA Agreement. The EU meanwhile has decided to initiate a parallel process. The outcome of these will obviously have longer-term repercussions. Hopefully, we'll find the way to adjust the functioning of the Agreement and the pertinent institutions to the changing circumstances, making it more efficient and focused.
2010 has also been a period of unfolding public debate about a number of EU directives and regulations. Obviously, we follow this very closely, respecting the fact that it is a Norwegian debate. But it is also true that the debate is about the implementation of an agreement shared by both of us, alongside other partners. It is nice to see that (according, once again, to public opinion polls) there is a clear majority among Norwegians on incorporating the directive which has produced the most intense debate and has most probably got the widest coverage in the press this year.
Thirdly, the EU has made a number of steps implementing the Lisbon Treaty and the process has had important repercussions for our relationship with Norway, though we need time to see the longer-term consequences more clearly. The European External Action Service will be up and running 1 January 2011 and I have to report to you that I have already been transferred to the new service together with all the staff of our Delegation.
Fourthly, the EU and Norway have arrived to agreements on a number of important (and complex) matters in the area of fisheries, agricultural trade and the EEA and Norway Financial Mechanisms, to mention just a few, which will determine work in the respective fields in the coming years.
So, what is the heritage of 2010 for us? Has this been a difficult but overall positive year? You will tell us. I have tried to provide some elements for your reflection. In the meantime let me wish to everybody who reads these lines Merry Xmas and a New Year that will be (even) better than the one ending now.
Firstly, the health of the euro (and that of the whole EU economy) has been under close scrutiny throughout the year. Although recovery is visible and the basic underlying processes are positive, the crisis is not over and several member states had to introduce radical austerity programmes. Due mainly to the crisis and according to public opinion polls, at present only one in four Norwegians would support EU membership. But we all hope that the crisis will be overcome.
On the other side of the same coin, events have revealed in a striking manner the far-reaching consequences of the fact that our economies (of Norway and the EU) are so closely integrated. It has dawned upon us that continued difficulties would affect all sides and there is a clear common interest in rising above them. I hope the understanding of this will be more durable that the crisis itself.
Secondly, this year has seen Norway launching a reflection on the experiences with the EEA Agreement. The EU meanwhile has decided to initiate a parallel process. The outcome of these will obviously have longer-term repercussions. Hopefully, we'll find the way to adjust the functioning of the Agreement and the pertinent institutions to the changing circumstances, making it more efficient and focused.
2010 has also been a period of unfolding public debate about a number of EU directives and regulations. Obviously, we follow this very closely, respecting the fact that it is a Norwegian debate. But it is also true that the debate is about the implementation of an agreement shared by both of us, alongside other partners. It is nice to see that (according, once again, to public opinion polls) there is a clear majority among Norwegians on incorporating the directive which has produced the most intense debate and has most probably got the widest coverage in the press this year.
Thirdly, the EU has made a number of steps implementing the Lisbon Treaty and the process has had important repercussions for our relationship with Norway, though we need time to see the longer-term consequences more clearly. The European External Action Service will be up and running 1 January 2011 and I have to report to you that I have already been transferred to the new service together with all the staff of our Delegation.
Fourthly, the EU and Norway have arrived to agreements on a number of important (and complex) matters in the area of fisheries, agricultural trade and the EEA and Norway Financial Mechanisms, to mention just a few, which will determine work in the respective fields in the coming years.
So, what is the heritage of 2010 for us? Has this been a difficult but overall positive year? You will tell us. I have tried to provide some elements for your reflection. In the meantime let me wish to everybody who reads these lines Merry Xmas and a New Year that will be (even) better than the one ending now.
torsdag 18. november 2010
Norwegians interested in the EU
I am reading in the papers that according to the latest public opinion polls slightly more than 30 % of Norwegians support EU membership, meanwhile around 60 % oppose it.
These figures are there for some months already. They are important indicators. They deserve serious analysis that goes well beyond the frames of this blog and of my reach.
Paal Frisvold, leader of the European Movement stated to the press in this respect that one of the reasons for these figures might be that the EU (and the important benefits it brings) is not sufficiently known in Norway.
I agree that this is an important aspect. As a matter of fact it can be dealt with separated from the membership issue. (There might be many people who recognise the merits of the EU in general, but still do not want Norwegian membership).
After having spent more than one year in Oslo, I do not cease to be impressed by the massive EU interest among people in general and their genuine wish to learn about it and understand it better. Most Norwegians recognise that in the past the EU has been crucial in transforming Europe in a way which is very positive – also for Norway. Many also believe that bringing closer our nations in Europe is the only possibility if we want to face global challenges. So (according to many and interpreted with some simplification) the EU played an essential positive role in the past, will be part of the solution in the future, but might not be good enough right now.
Why has this view become relatively widespread? The economic and financial crisis has had its impact, as (hopefully) EU efforts to overcome it will also be recognised as they unfold. It is also true that everyday news (by its nature) tends to point out shortcomings, difficulties and mishaps. Nevertheless, we should not allow that the EU trees (there are many) hide the EU forest.
But I know there might be many differing positions and not everybody thinks about this issue as I do. I would be very interested to having your views on the matter.
These figures are there for some months already. They are important indicators. They deserve serious analysis that goes well beyond the frames of this blog and of my reach.
Paal Frisvold, leader of the European Movement stated to the press in this respect that one of the reasons for these figures might be that the EU (and the important benefits it brings) is not sufficiently known in Norway.
I agree that this is an important aspect. As a matter of fact it can be dealt with separated from the membership issue. (There might be many people who recognise the merits of the EU in general, but still do not want Norwegian membership).
After having spent more than one year in Oslo, I do not cease to be impressed by the massive EU interest among people in general and their genuine wish to learn about it and understand it better. Most Norwegians recognise that in the past the EU has been crucial in transforming Europe in a way which is very positive – also for Norway. Many also believe that bringing closer our nations in Europe is the only possibility if we want to face global challenges. So (according to many and interpreted with some simplification) the EU played an essential positive role in the past, will be part of the solution in the future, but might not be good enough right now.
Why has this view become relatively widespread? The economic and financial crisis has had its impact, as (hopefully) EU efforts to overcome it will also be recognised as they unfold. It is also true that everyday news (by its nature) tends to point out shortcomings, difficulties and mishaps. Nevertheless, we should not allow that the EU trees (there are many) hide the EU forest.
But I know there might be many differing positions and not everybody thinks about this issue as I do. I would be very interested to having your views on the matter.
mandag 25. oktober 2010
The European External Action Service
The service supporting the foreign and external policy of the European Union will start soon. (The target date is 1 December 2010) It will be called European External Action Service (EEAS). Many Norwegians ask me the question: will the EEAS be the foreign ministry of the EU? Usually there is no short and/or simple answer to similar questions, because EU moves are by nature complex or for the reason that they are novel. Most frequently they are both at the same time. (Therefore not the best topics for short blogs)
The EEAS is a prime example. It is groundbreaking; nothing alike has existed before. Preparations were difficult and took a long time. EEAS staff will come from two EU institutions (the Commission and the Council) as well as from the diplomatic services of the 27 Member States. They will work under the High Representative of the EU, who at the same time is also Vice President of the European Commission. The 135 EU Delegations around the world (including the one in Oslo) will be part and parcel of the new service. The EEAS is designed to become a tool to establish better the EU as a global player both in its immediate neighbourhood and in faraway regions.
The effort is the first in its kind and it is obviously a fascinating story to follow. But the jury is out, it will be judged by its performance and you might have your own opinion on this.
The EEAS is a prime example. It is groundbreaking; nothing alike has existed before. Preparations were difficult and took a long time. EEAS staff will come from two EU institutions (the Commission and the Council) as well as from the diplomatic services of the 27 Member States. They will work under the High Representative of the EU, who at the same time is also Vice President of the European Commission. The 135 EU Delegations around the world (including the one in Oslo) will be part and parcel of the new service. The EEAS is designed to become a tool to establish better the EU as a global player both in its immediate neighbourhood and in faraway regions.
The effort is the first in its kind and it is obviously a fascinating story to follow. But the jury is out, it will be judged by its performance and you might have your own opinion on this.
torsdag 21. oktober 2010
Going skiing
I have just had a very pleasant visit to Mr Fabian Stang, the Mayor of Oslo. He explained to me the present state of affairs in this capital city and spoke about plans of development. He also asked me kindly how I felt here, whether Oslo treated me well. As many Norwegians, he inquired about my progress in skiing.
These are not just diplomatic questions. These are very important issues and in the hustle of everyday life we do not give enough thought to them. Writer Aron Tamasi says somewhere that our most human urge is to be at home in life.
I responded to Mr Stang that after one year I had arrived to enjoying living in Oslo and appreciating very much that I am close to nature and among a lot of good partners and friends. Not even the fact that we have November darkness looming on the horizon can take this feeling away. All the more, at the urging of my wife I have agreed that this weekend we go to buy ski equipment. She has discovered a shop with very good prices.
These are not just diplomatic questions. These are very important issues and in the hustle of everyday life we do not give enough thought to them. Writer Aron Tamasi says somewhere that our most human urge is to be at home in life.
I responded to Mr Stang that after one year I had arrived to enjoying living in Oslo and appreciating very much that I am close to nature and among a lot of good partners and friends. Not even the fact that we have November darkness looming on the horizon can take this feeling away. All the more, at the urging of my wife I have agreed that this weekend we go to buy ski equipment. She has discovered a shop with very good prices.
mandag 4. oktober 2010
Bergen
I spent the day of 24 September in Bergen, together with European Commissioner Janez Potocnik, responsible for environment, attending the Ministerial Meeting of OSPAR. OSPAR is the mechanism to implement the Oslo and the Paris Conventions, adopted to protect the marine environment in the North-East Atlantic.
At the morning, before the conference we had a good meeting with Minister Erik Solheim in his hotel room. It was good to witness how well the Minister and the Commissioner understood each other, both having clear and rather similar ideas on how to make ongoing worldwide environmental efforts succeed.
On a more personal note: I enjoyed to be in Bergen and stayed over for part of the weekend, together with my wife. The town was splendid, washed in the autumn sunshine and (for the first time) we had enough time to explore the beauty of the old houses close to the centre. We went shopping at the famous fish market. People even offered to us whale meet to taste, which of course was for us one step too far. But will go definitely back – both officially and in private capacity.
At the morning, before the conference we had a good meeting with Minister Erik Solheim in his hotel room. It was good to witness how well the Minister and the Commissioner understood each other, both having clear and rather similar ideas on how to make ongoing worldwide environmental efforts succeed.
On a more personal note: I enjoyed to be in Bergen and stayed over for part of the weekend, together with my wife. The town was splendid, washed in the autumn sunshine and (for the first time) we had enough time to explore the beauty of the old houses close to the centre. We went shopping at the famous fish market. People even offered to us whale meet to taste, which of course was for us one step too far. But will go definitely back – both officially and in private capacity.
onsdag 22. september 2010
Commissioner Andor in Oslo
13th September I spent a day in Oslo
These two organizations met for the first time at the highest level to discuss how to mitigate the social consequences of the economic crisis. Addressing the meeting, the Commissioner said that 2008 was "annus horribilis" for finance, 2009 for economic growth and 2010 for employment. If we fail to act, 2011 may turn out to be "annus horribilis" for social cohesion. He called for clear commitments on employment and social development alongside economic policies.
No way to deny, I enjoyed mingling with personalities such as the Prime Minister of Greece or the head of the IMF. It is even more memorable that I could feel that under the weight of the crisis there is growing awareness of the need for coordination at the global level. Congratulations to the Norwegian hosts of the event!
These two organizations met for the first time at the highest level to discuss how to mitigate the social consequences of the economic crisis. Addressing the meeting, the Commissioner said that 2008 was "annus horribilis" for finance, 2009 for economic growth and 2010 for employment. If we fail to act, 2011 may turn out to be "annus horribilis" for social cohesion. He called for clear commitments on employment and social development alongside economic policies.
No way to deny, I enjoyed mingling with personalities such as the Prime Minister of Greece or the head of the IMF. It is even more memorable that I could feel that under the weight of the crisis there is growing awareness of the need for coordination at the global level. Congratulations to the Norwegian hosts of the event!
Abonner på:
Innlegg (Atom)
